Firstly ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark
I ... establish my target (so I can ignore and neg her)
|
Yuk. That's not very nice. And what crime has she commited to deserve this treatment? The crime of being sexually attractive to you. Don't punish her for that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark
how [do] you guys rate HBs ... and [does] it affect your approach / technique?
|
Looks-wise I tend to think and talk about girls using real terms that I think describe them like pretty, cute, average, beautiful, ugly, etc. I also look for non-aesthetic qualities that girls have which affect how attracted I am too. These are all qualitative rather than quantitative, and they don't de-humanise the object of your attraction.
With the numbering system you have to rate incommensurable qualities alongside one another. One girl might be really pretty, another really intelligent, a third really stylish, a fourth a bit cute and really funny, a fifth extremely sexy. To try and decide which is best is like comparing apples and oranges.
Also, I don't think I could maintain any consistency through a numbering system. I've seen people on here say "I was in a two set (HB7.6 and HB8.4)". What the fuck! How are they maintaining any kind of calibration through, what is effectively, a 100 point rating system?
Seriously!
To the second part of your question. I don't think about game and how to sun it in each or any instance. I just get on with it. Naturally. I give every girl the benefit of the doubt that she is probably a nice person and will want to suck me off
. Then I 'play it by ear', as they say.
To parody Number 6 "She's not a number. She's a fit girl".
Peace,
kowalski