I recently checked out Tyler's Blueprint De-Coded. He's a philosopher too, so really speaks my language. I've only ever been this excited by two products: First, Tim's Flawless Natural, and now, Tyler's Blueprint De-Coded. The latter surpasses the former immeasurably. Though the former still has it's own value. I now view Flawless Natural as an example of the behaviours of a person who lives the concepts of Blueprint De-Coded. An appendix.

I recommend the Blueprint to everyone here. I will also be circulating it to a bunch of my non-PU friends, boys and girls.


Anywho, down to business...
This is a thread where we can discuss the concepts in the Blueprint and our application of them.


2nd Rate Behaviour

"I don't accept 2nd rate behaviour and that goes for me and you."


This really struck a chord with me. I certainly don't accept 2nd rate behaviour and from others. That's standard. What I've found I do do is respond badly to others 2nd rate behaviour.

For example: Recently, prior to watching Blueprint, I was in Boots waiting at the counter to be served. 5 staff members were behind the counter talking about the previous nights TV. Not serving me. I've worked in customer service roles and would never do that. I don't accept this 2nd rate behaviour from myself and don't accept it from others.

I became emotionally involved with my thought process, got pissy, and said "Oi woman! Less talkie more workie. And you mate, fetch me the manager. Now!"

Then I unleashed some more shit on the manager.


How did I feel? The release was good. The build-up was bad, and the lingering feeling was negative too.

I got what I wanted: Service.
I got what I didn't want: Angry.

Who does that anger serve? Nobody. I could have got what I wanted, service, and made a complaint whilst not getting emotionally involved.

My behaviour was 2nd rate and I allowed myself to kill my own happy state.

I behaved like a dick.


Hearing Tyler say "I don't accept 2nd rate behaviour and that goes for me and you." made me think about this event and a million others like it. I have always reveled in my verbal destruction of those who crossed me. Taking a perverse enjoyment out of it.



So now I'm playing a game, like the one Tolle writes about. I am catching myself at the first moment I find myself having a negative emotional response to trivial events around me and cutting them off.

I'm remaining chill and happy, and dealing with the situation appropriately and without lowering my own behaviour beyond the acceptable.

I think the more I learn to not accept 2nd rate behaviour from myself, regardless of the situation, the less reactive I will become. I will still take action to get what I want. This will benefit me and everyone I interact with. As nothing is to be gained from my old routine behaviour and attitude.


Peace,

kowalski

Cant type much Im on a gay phone. This is prob 1 of the most important threads here. I will be commenting more after my hols.

ive not seen this yet have you got it?

Sounds good. Maintaining a positive mindset throughout and not dipping to other people's sometimes depressive levels is something I am tackling in my life. It is right that getting irrate serves no purpose. It is loose loose, all round.

Defo feeling the Natural Tim stuff too.

If you have this i would be very interested in it.

Both Sapmi and I have the audio. I have no facility to burn anyone a copy.

So hit Mark up for it.

I'd love to check out the video version, if anyone can sort it out.


Peace,

kowalski

P.s. Obey copyright laws, kids.

P.p.s. Winners don't take drugs.

Really enjoying Blueprint De-Coded. Fantastic. Very impressed that he moved away from pickup lines into this - developing a solid mentality. I've been doing quite a bit of the stuff he mentioned anyway (in terms of confidence, fun etc), but there is new stuff, and he communicates stuff really well.

One of the bits that I liked -physical attractiveness (for men) doesn't matter, but cuter men are given different social feedback to others, and so become more attractive based on their mentality...

kowalski - is the philosophy behind this product valid? (ie, does it make sense etc.)?

some other articles from these guys here:
Real Social Dynamics Wiki - RSD Classic Articles

As someone who didn’t think they get a lot of this I was pleasantly surprised to find I was completely wrong. This is awesome. It takes PUA away from its geeky association shows the real honest to god benefits of enjoying your life in any situation. This makes more sense to me and someone who would consider them self as somewhat spiritual. You can defiantly feel the influence of Eckhart Tolle when he goes into describing state.

Check out the notes of what exactly it goes into.

The Blueprint Decoded Notes

Hey Anthony,

Yes. The philosophy is pretty sound. My bullshit-o-meter never went off even once, which is a rarity for me. Especially seeing as there are over 20 hours of opportunity for him to start talking shit and yet he never does.

In fact in many places I would have gone a lot deeper. It makes sense that he didn't take certain concepts to their logical conclusion though as it would have made the product inaccessable for most people.

Throw down any concepts you may be unsure about the validity of and we'll have a good old philosophical dialogue on them.


Peace,

kowalski

Cool - cheers K, good to know that someone who knows more about philosophy has ok'd it too.

---

Now, do you guys have any updates on going out after listening to this stuff?

Went out on friday in london, first time after hours of Tyler's rantings making my ears near burst.

For me, the major revelation was my frame, my confidence, my state... Keeping it up, even if I don't look too hot, or am not sure what to say. Confident all the time, but flexible. Female attraction is (probably) very thinly related to looks. This is something that clicked with me (I guess it made sense in my reality).

First half of the night - a bit rough, some fun sets and did some cool things (learned a new dance move from some girls), but didn't really feel that any sets ''hooked' properly. Blew out on a number of occasions, even where I felt my state was high. Did meet one very cool girl though (friend material, I would be very happy to keep in touch with her). I got one textbook facebook flake - tell me your name and I'll find you on facebook! yea, right... She was part of a huge birthday girl set - I wanted to spend more time with this girl, but the place was loud, really high energy, and I got a bit of a bad vibe after going for (my first ever) apocalypse on two girls in the group (at the same time !!).

Second half - at a bus stop, waiting to go home - I open situational on a girl at the bus stop, and then kick in with the apocalypse. 'I only just met you of course not' !!! haha, but I think if you pull this off properly, then your frame will be the impressive thing - we got chatting, her friends arrive, and invite me to a club with them. I call my wing (who gets off the bus to re-join me), and we hit the club. Lots and lots of kino and eventually a k and n-close, but logistically a tough set - she is out with her sister, and only in london for a few weeks. She kept saying 'i'm not a slut, I'm not gonna go back with you', but I kept hinting. Eventually she said that 'if my sister wasn't here, we would be fucking right now' (internal thought: not a slut?...)... hmm... how could I have sorted out these logistics?...
In the same club, and roughly the same time (I kept going between the two sets, and I introduced them) I met a russian girl, I opened with nothing - just sat down next to her, and 'hello' - but I felt in state I guess. Anyways, she kept giving me the 'not tonight' line re:sex, - so many times - but eventually we k-closed (in front of the other girl; not the coolest), and eventually did go back to her place.

So my first night after this stuff. Mixed bag. Actually, I'm not ecstatic with a single night lay - that's not exactly what I'm after in this - I want to be good in all situations, and not loose good sets. Consistency killed the cat.

Any thoughts people?

Tyler keeps suggested that your frame is the only key factor, and what you say has less to do with it. Not 100% convinced as yet, interesting and a fun outlook though, I'll peruse it. I can re-post this somewhere else if it's too off-topic, but I think its interesting to see how this stuff works in practice.