Yeah MB, I think that is the kind of stuff Tom is alluding to when he mentioned talking about work.
For me these things are usually around stupid little theories I have. For example if I'm ever called out for taking drugs because I value my mind and they damage it I'll trot out my fun little theory on the subject which goes something like this:
"Thing is ... do you ever watch Attenborough shows and you see the wildebeast or some such stampeding across some desert plain? Yeah, the lions or whatever their natural fucking predator is hunts that shit down and they pick off the weak, lame and slow beasts around the back of the herd. It's good ol' Limpy Bob that gets it. That shit actually IMPROVES the speed and efficiency of the herd, cause the herd becomes faster and more streamlined. FUCK YEAH! I feel like getting smarter! Lets hit some sambucas and wipe out some more of our brains' dead weight."
(I'm not actually stupid enough to believe that by the way. I just like think it is fun. Sometimes I may pretend I believe it for a bit just for giggles, but will admit I don't after a bit.)
Right. Now that will come out in a whole series of ways, it isn't repeated word for word or anything. More importantly though - Why is it natural and authentic when a scripted routine isn't? Purpose. The purpose of me saying that is, it is appropriate to the conversation at the time and it is fun for me. There is absolutely no forethought in it i just blurt it out, so at a deeper level it is really for no reason (unless I've been asked a more difficult question and have thought more about the answer before replying). The purpose of a routine, on the other hand, is to raise or lower someone's value, to qualify or disqualify you or the other, to initiate kino, to get or hold attention or to achieve some other kind of reaction or manipulate peoples feelings and opinions about me or themselves in some way.
So I'm just talking to people the same way I've always done. Whereas someone employing tactical social manouvers (s/p?), whether using pre-scripted stuff or making it up on the fly, is doing something entirely different.
The only time I really consider my speech at a level where social manipulation is taking place is in my professional life. At work they pay for a Dialler Manager and they want a Dialler Manager. They want me as that Dialler Manager. So they want me to be myself except where that clashes with being a Dialler Manager, at those moments, where the two clash, they are paying me to do what a Dialler Manager would do and not what kowalski would do. And, I will do and say whatever it takes to achieve the desired outcome appropriate for a Dialler Manager to want to achieve at that moment in that situation. I have so many relationships at work that, from a kowalski perspective, are total bullshit. I literally hate some of the people I work with, how they operate, what they stand for etc., but I am professional enough to go beyond that and continually change my communication style till I find the one that, for each individual I interact with, gets them to behave in ways that assist me in achieving my goals as a Dialler Manager and the overall goals of the business.
At work the rules are different. I sell my soul. We all do.
(Went a bit off topic there, still it is interesting shit to me how that whole thing works. For more on the this Sartrean idea read the passages about the waiter here -
Sincerity - in fact it is a pretty good and not especially long article with some other really neat Sartrean exmaples of bad faith so just read the whole thing it's full of good shit.)
Peace,
kowalski