It doesn't have to take any time at all. It can be as instant as walking up to her and opening your mouth. Hence the beauty of being direct. Until you do so, who knows how attracted she is to you.

Body language and voice tonality are probably the most important elements in a girl's attraction towards you. Anything else could be just fleeting, i.e. a girl may think, 'he's hot... until he opened his mouth' or 'until I noticed his nervous eye contact'.

Interesting, to say the least. I am taking it on-board.

narrow and vague are not mutually exclusive contradictory concepts..i am not therefore saying "direct" as a concept is "A" and also not "A" at the same time.

ur definitions of vague and narrow arent in keeping with mine.

1) narrow - Barely sufficient.

narrow - definition of narrow by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

2) vague - Not clear in meaning or application. Indistinctly felt, perceived, understood, or recalled.

vague - definition of vague by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

1 causes 2. the law of the excluded middle is in no way breached. if ur about to say im being selective in my definitions i could just as easily same the same to u, however i refer u to the above websites as references.

the real point remains that ur definition is lacking..ur equation simply does not fully define this none scientific term. im sure u agree.

"Barely sufficient" was not your definition of narrow at the point of posting, as is borne out by the context. It would merely have been convenient that you had been able to find a definition that could have helped you to escape the contradiction, if this were a legal case; which it is not.


Peace,

kowalski

I'm done toying with you now, Joe. It's fun for a bit but it's just cruel of me really.


Peace,

kowalski

joe you have underlying beef with k which is why you have completely gone psycho in this thread?

also it can be so difficult to grasp your points because of your writing style. it definitely does not appeal to the masses

i also spotted what i think is an error in your post, but i could be wrong.
you mentioned narrow and vague being non mutually exclusive in retort to kowalskis statement of his definition being narrow AND vague

hmmm didnt know u could read minds..i would say the context fully bares out my intuitive understanding of above referred to definitions.

anyway.

bro my case has been proven..ur definition is vague narrow and lacking..in essence shite and not fit for purpose!

ur comments, whilst entertaining, could possibly serve as mitigation....at best. case closed g ;P

peace

na yo..i got mad lovz for kdogg

i know...ah well

na my comments were right


peace

ok :>


too short to submit