Hi Folks,

I am looking at resolving this sticking point of mine.

Here goes: I can escalate from the bar/sitting area to the dancefloor. But to be honest, it has been a bit of hit and miss of late.

For example, what I do is make fluff talk with the HB and when I feel that there is enough rapport, I ask the HB if she wants to join me on the dance floor.. If she is going for a drink, I tell her: "Why don't you get your drink and join me on the dance floor? Half of the time it works.

But, I want a 'fool proof' method of getting her to join me on the dance floor all the time (or most).

Has anyone had this as a sticking point and resolved it? And also how do you isolate successfully (all/most of the time?)

Much appreciated..

i thought this was gonna b escalating from bar to home. dancefloor is just optional middle bit isnt it. There is not one thing that will always work, you seen groundhog day when bill murray gets ambushed by the snowballers. he gets less and less sincere and in th moment every time it happens. mix it up, use the situation. 'Dare you to try to out dance me in those stupid shoes' 'That guy over there said u were less coordinated than a drunk elephant with bricks tied to its feet, prove him wrong'.. 'get your vagina on the dance floor biatch' i'm just making these up but they would all work.

I don't even ask any more. I just hold out my little finger which they always hook their little finger on to and then I lead them to the dance floor.

You have bought into the PUA lie. Nothing will work all the time or most of the time.


Peace,

kowalski

Tell her - we're going to dance. Then lead her by the hand.

If there is enough comfort built up she will come.

Girls love dancing.

Although, I would never advocate paying for PUA material, (the exception to this rule is certain books) Kowalski’s opinion is very much based on his own set of moral standards which he imposes on almost every thread, fair enough everyone is entitled to a strong view point but to sacrifice honesty in the process is bullshit.

MM works
Keiza system works
Style system works
Gambler system works

The above systems very closely resemble each other because they cater to a process and how a female mind is attracted to a male. They also exploit weaknesses in humans like ‘we always want what we can't have’ etc, etc the systems are of course subject to abuse but so is alcohol or drugs.

Pinning a set of standards on it just because it works is pointless.

Don't get me wrong I think one is circus clown, Miss Knockers has sold her sisters down the river, style is just a slaphead and gambler is sleazy fucker.
PU works anyone who understands the complex behaviours of men and women or anyone out last night teasing a girl will agree with me. The way its peddled and everything else that goes with it is fundamentally wrong, but it does work.

Saying it doesn’t just because of the morality is wrong.

Knave is delusional and obsessed with me. He says things here that he doesn't really believe in, so as to present a fake internet persona to everyone in every thread. He fails to pull it off, everyone sees that it is fake and he just comes across as a dick.

He is just trolling, no one even mentioned morality. Dumbass.


Peace,

kowalski

Are we agreeing that PU such as MM works?

what would that be? "Come to the dancefloor, i'll show you the cube"

I'm sure Knave pre-emptively attacks morality in every thread he thinks I might post in.

I still don't have a clue what his problem is with telling people it's better in the long term to be a sincerely good person opposed to a deceptive dick. Reputation counts, you can have either or you can sit in the middle and have none.

I know what I'd rather have.

Yes, I was originally motivated by this utilitarian logic, the thing is that once you cross over into the "sincere" side of things it's simply who you are, unmotivated.

It's funny how that really simple thought changed who I am so completely and totally.