If you have had an arranged marraige and never actually pulled a girl by yourself should you be able to teach someone how to become a PUA?
I've seen a lot of things floating about on the net and was wondering what people would think if they found out that the teacher didn't really have the credentials and was a fraud.
I was thinking if you know the theory then you could still pass knowledge onto people but would you have the respect of someone who can and has gotten lots of women?

is a science teacher qualified to teach science. Yes

enuf for you to pass an exam .. yes

but not enuf for u to be an scientific innovator... experience does that

Trying to teach knowledge you have no experience in is flawed.
You are bound to introduce errors into the knowledge due to the limitations of language. Like Chinese whispers.
That's why schools examinations are flawed. Cramming in information without properly understanding it and relating it to personal experience does not constitute proper knowledge.

Anyone can teach anything, but only to a certain extent if they dont have experience.

My drug & alcohol support worker told me that when i am doing her job & working for the same organisation, i will be 5 times better at it than her cos i have been there done that, & she hasnt ever took drugs.

Experience.

wonder who prompted this question?!

You can teach, for sure, but only ever the robotics, the nuances that differentiate between theory and reality will never be there. It is like painting by numbers, the picture might be there, but there is no nuance and no beauty, and plus, if you fuck up one bit, you are done, because you don't have the intuitive ability to turn it around and make instinctive decisions.

Some people can see from the outside way more than others can see from the inside. The top sales agent at work couldn't coach the other agents to improve, but I could though I have never done it.

You can only measure a teacher by the change in their students.


Peace,

kowalski

Most practical things you probably can teach to a degree without experience but you'll need solid theory or good insight. However neither the teacher or the student will be good at XYZ in the real world without practice.

In terms of pickup - it depends what you call 'teaching' really. You can convey theory, but as we know, much of the theory out there is BS.

Anyone being dogmatic about pickup is a fraud anyway. There is no 'true way' from what I've seen at least, just some broad principles which can be useful, but no 'rules'.

A lot of people saying this, but it isn't true just a prejudice.


Peace,

kowalski

This!

As a teacher I have seen colleagues who haven't a great deal of practical experience but are very intuitive with subject matter that they read. They are able to sift through various texts, journals and papers evaluating through reasoning what is credible and what is junk. What the student learns is the subject matter and often gains the teachers perspective on interpreting information. The downside being a teacher who assimilates all info yet learns nothing

On the other side I have seen people come from a practical background and because they have experience with working systems and seeing principles in action, they are able to pass the working knowledge on to the student and offer sound advice regarding practical nuances. The students here generally learn a more applicable approach. The danger here being a teacher who has learned practically but is unable to perform them well

As K rightly points out though it is measured by the student therefore it is based mainly on how the student learns.

So why do you all think The Jackal got such a hard time?