Yo guyz, just stumbled upon this, it seems pretty good and it makes sense.

http://www.puatraining.com/The-Rejection-Report.pdf

Will give this shizzle a go tomorrow and shall let y'all know

Just had a quick flick through this and it does look good, I await the videos with anticipation...

What a load of tosh! I've just read it, that's half an hour of my life i'll never get back. Despite it claiming to be ground-breaking there is nothing new here at all.

Whilst I respect Gambler and where he claims he came from I would not endorse this product.

Essentially what is being sold to you is a form of game that is so stealth and under the radar that it is 'rejection proof'. So stealth infact that the girl does not realise she is being picked up, as you are operating below her 'Perceptual Escalation Threshold' (Yes, really). The aim is your advancements essentially go so undetected, she cannot read you and therefore cannot choose to accept you or reject you (Hence the rejection proof bit). To me this is just a concept of the Mystery Method re-packaged with the emphasis on being indirect to the nth degree.

Why develop this concept then in the first place?

Richard says;

'I talked with the students, analyzed the commonalities and differences between the guys who weren’t making the progresses and the guys who were…and I racked my brain.

After weeks of thinking, it hit me…some guys were just flat out SCARED to approach!'

Gosh! why so scared?!

With the same level of intense brain-racking he came to the equally profound conclusion that these guys were scared of rejection! This concept is therefore designed to try to eradicate rejection as much as possible from 'pick-up' to protect those poor souls who are so fearful of it. Correct me if im wrong but aren't the countless methods of indirect approaches and canned material designed essentially to minimise your chances of rejection?

Besides, why is rejection something so fearful that we need to protect ourselves from it at all costs? Is this really a healthy way to live? Gambler argues that 'Growing a thick skin' and taking your fair share of hits of rejection isn't the answer, avoiding it all together is. This concept is geared obviously towards seducing women, but what about in other areas of life such as during a job interview? Are you supposed to conduct yourself in such a stealth like manner, giving little away as possible so that the interviewer cannot logically come to a conclusion as to your suitability to the job that they inevitably don't reject you? Of course not?! that wouldn't make sense?

If you are fearful of rejection in any area of life, be it women, in your work, with family or friends even, the answer surely is not to keep running away from it, avoiding it all costs. You will end up just leading a life in fear constantly looking over your shoulder. Going through life without feeling a sense of rejection is nigh on impossible, it's going to happen at some point. Surely the best course of action is to accept this, become accustomed to the sensation, learn to dealt with it and have the mechanisms in place to move on and learn from the experience.

As the sayings go;

'What doesn't kill you only makes you stronger'
'You learn more from your failures than your successess'

This can be applied to ordeals in life, not just in pick-up.

The message should not be about wrapping people in cotton wool and keeping them away from the 'dangers' of rejection. In the long run this is not a healthy mindset. You will inevitably face your fair share of rejections in life and adopting this attitude will not serve you well when eventually faced with it. This is a detrimental attitude to take.

Now, the rest of the report reads as a lenghty marketing speil, it is vague, abit wishy washy throws in 'bullshit baffles brains' concepts such as 'Perceptual Escalation Threshold', 'The Pattern Recognition Principle' and 'The Stealth Attraction Model' shortend to 'SAM' just how the community loves it!. These ground breaking concepts which will 'turn the seduction community on its head!' have the credibility of being tested by Gambler himself for a period of three years! All in order to protect you guys from rejection, how benevolent.

Its one saving grace is what Gambler calls 'The Effort Effect' which is essentially a concept of not being try-hard when seducing women as this is percieved as low-value. However many of us know this already and recognise that exerting little effort and appearing effortless is much more high-value.

Videos are soon to be released of these concepts 'in-action' with further details added to the currently rather vague concepts....I would imagine to be fully enlightened you will need to part with some 'De Niro'.

What strikes me as odd is that for a company that initially advocated towards being direct would suddenly launch a product that is so stealth it's not even that indirect but confusing. To close some deals you have to state what your intentions are otherwise you ain't getting anything!

If I was reviewing this product in the review section I'd give it 0 stars.

This is nothing personal against the guys at PUAtraining, I appreciate what they do but those guys can do better than this!

It's another poor product from the master of marketing, Gambler.

We are men resolving to do something and achieving our goals despite fear, pain and distraction is what defines us as men. Check out this awesome article on what it really takes to become great, and not just in PU.

Trickery | RSD Nation


And remember ... Don't build your game around how not to get blown out. Build your game around how to get blown off.


Peace,

kowalski

Hell yeah.

Great review Hustler. This type of material is the usual magic fix pill for those who want a solution within weeks.

That's an awesome article, anyone who's getting a bit jaded with their own self improvement should read this.